<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integrity has left the building</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/01/integrity-has-left-the-building/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dailydanet.com/2009/01/integrity-has-left-the-building/</link>
	<description>Exposing Untruths, Injustice and UnAmerican Ways</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2015 21:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Wheat</title>
		<link>https://dailydanet.com/2009/01/integrity-has-left-the-building/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Wheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dailydanet.com/?p=497#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree 100% on Geithner, especially on the point about him mysteriously being the only man who can save us.  That incessant by-line is starting to get creepy, to be totally honest.  And I&#039;d like to remind everyone that Geithner was one of the masterminds of TARP; seriously, what is going on here?

It&#039;s the same story with Clinton.  Why does it HAVE to be her?  Why do we risk compromising our foreign policy or appearing to compromise it with a Secretary of State that has demonstrable conflicts of interest?  Is there no one else out there who has the chops to do the job and is squeaky clean?  The only explanation is that Obama was compelled to nominate her.

I&#039;ve written on both these subject on my own blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://the-children-of-the-revolution.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Children Of The Revolution&lt;/a&gt;, links below:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://the-children-of-the-revolution.blogspot.com/2009/01/voodoo-economics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Voodoo Economics&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://the-children-of-the-revolution.blogspot.com/2009/01/worth-trouble.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Worth The Trouble?&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100% on Geithner, especially on the point about him mysteriously being the only man who can save us.  That incessant by-line is starting to get creepy, to be totally honest.  And I&#8217;d like to remind everyone that Geithner was one of the masterminds of TARP; seriously, what is going on here?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same story with Clinton.  Why does it HAVE to be her?  Why do we risk compromising our foreign policy or appearing to compromise it with a Secretary of State that has demonstrable conflicts of interest?  Is there no one else out there who has the chops to do the job and is squeaky clean?  The only explanation is that Obama was compelled to nominate her.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written on both these subject on my own blog, <a href="http://the-children-of-the-revolution.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">The Children Of The Revolution</a>, links below:</p>
<p><a href="http://the-children-of-the-revolution.blogspot.com/2009/01/voodoo-economics.html" rel="nofollow">Voodoo Economics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://the-children-of-the-revolution.blogspot.com/2009/01/worth-trouble.html" rel="nofollow">Worth The Trouble?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
