Wasserman-Schultz wants to increase spending on the backs of yet unborn children.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Allen West are having a public spat. Allen West is claiming that, despite Obama’s endorsement, Wasserman Schultz’s history of lying and misrepresenting legislation means she is no lady. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is claiming that a bill that does not touch Social Security or Medicaid somehow overly burdens senior citizens. Today, Wasserman Schultz doubles down on stupid and again claims some mysterious impact on seniors.
Maybe she’s right, maybe the discretionary spending disproportionately effects septuagenarians who, despite having gone through menopause, nonetheless like to know how the size of a man’s penis impacts his popularity in the gay community. Or maybe Debbie just wants to balloon the size of the federal government on the backs of their as yet unborn grandchildren, great grandchildren and their great grandchildren, etc.
[...] subsidize corporate jets at the expense of children’s safety, or that you’re trying to balance the budget on the backs of seniors, children and the middle class, ask them if they’d rather deficit spend and print money on the backs of their unborn [...]